Sen. Tom's Caucus

The dems who have handed the GOP control of the Senate say the donkeys made them do it.

Washington state Democrats are fuming over the decision of two of their legislators to join Republicans to take over the Senate. "Perfidious" is what some Democratic activists are calling Senators Rodney Tom and Tim Sheldon.

Why'd they do it?

A Machiavellian play for power has been suggested, but it seems likely that something deeper was at work. Sheldon tells SW that, as a legislator from a rural district (comprising parts of Mason, Thurston, and Kitsap counties), he got tired of the Puget Sound–centrism evident among Democrats. If they remained in control this year, he says, the lion's share of Senate committee chairs would have gone to legislators from either Seattle or Tacoma. Last year, in what he sees as evidence of "insensitivity" to his part of the state, the Democrats proposed a budget that would have cut $1.2 million from the Mason County budget.

Perhaps even more than Sheldon, Tom seems like a man caught between parties. The Mercer Island legislator used to be a Republican, then switched sides in 2006, explaining that the "far right has complete control" of the GOP. Yet when he got to the Democratic caucus, says Deputy King County Executive Fred Jarrett, a former legislator and friend of Tom, "I think he found that he did not fit there as well as he would like to."

Tom tells SW that he still considers himself a "staunch Democrat," but also concedes that he's more fiscally conservative than many in his party. He says Democrats have a "We can't say no to anybody" approach, particularly when it comes to their favorite government-funded programs.

It's hard to know what the now-reigning Republicans in the Senate will do this year, but on at least one key issue, the two parties may not be as far apart as some believe.

Superintendent of Public Instruction Randy Dorn, in an interview with SW, observes that both parties now recognize that they are obliged to come up with much more money for schools—a state Supreme Court ruling ordering just that gives them no choice. "The Democrats are saying $4 billion, the Republicans are saying $3.5 billion," Dorn says. He adds that the parties don't agree on how to come up with the money, but in dollar amounts, they're within shouting distance of each other.

comments powered by Disqus

Friends to Follow